inside

Adjusting World welcomes emails/letters to the editor and comments on any of our articles. Emails/letters should not exceed 250 words in length and can be sent to the individual email address listed on the article or to: comments@adjustingworld.com.

All emails/letters received become the property of Adjusting World and cannot be returned. Adjusting World reserves the right to print, edit for space, grammar, and clarity. Letters must include the name, address, telephone number and email address of the author. Adjusting World reserves the right to limit the number of emails/letters printed.


 
   

Editor's 2 Cents

Conspiracy Theories Abound!

William Nathans
Editor

bill@adjustingworld.com  

I find it interesting that it took the WCAB, with an en banc decision, to throw our workers compensation community into a state of panic. The Almaraz/Guzman decision did just that. The Board in its prior decisions stated that it was not the place of the WCAB to act in the place of the Legislature… but they did just that.

I find it curious that a Board, that a majority of which were appointed by the Governor, voted to throw permanent disability ratings into such a state that no one knows what to do.

There is a school of thought that says the decision was designed to punish the Legislature, Governor and the Administrative Director for failing to deliver on the promise to produce a new rating schedule.

The Legislature is being punished for failing to confirm Carrie Nevans as the AD while she was working on the new schedule.

The Governor is being punished for vetoing every attempt to increase the permanent disability payments, even though the increase was supported by the President of Zenith Insurance.

Arnold was smart enough to realize that this would be necessary to keep the main reforms of SB-899 intact. The AD is being punished for failing to deliver the new rating scheduled as promised.

The WCAB decided that it was time to get people's attention... and they did.

It will be interesting to see what happens with the recon currently before them...what do you think?

 

  

Comments, questions, e-mail me at bill@adjustingworld.com

top of page

   
 
Legal Update

The Pitfalls of the Pre-trial Conference Statement

Stephen L. Kline, Esq.
steve@adjustingworld.com

In the intricate procedural world of  workers’ compensation, one of the most important documents is the Pre-trial Conference Statement, commonly known as the “Five-pager”.  This document sets out the stipulations of the parties. 

 

Stipulations are agreed upon statements that are taken by the Judge as true and cannot be contested.  The injured worker was born on ….   The employer is insured by …. And so on and so forth.  Care must be taken with stipulations, because, if you agree to it on the form, contesting later on at trial or appeal is very hard & maybe impossible.

 

Also included in the Five-pager are the issues that the Workers’ Compensation Judge is being asked to decide.  While this may seem obvious to most people, the actual question of what you want the Judge to decide and what is the evidence that you have to support your position on that issue is critical to getting the outcome you want for the case.   These are the “basics” that make or break a case.

 

Finally, there is a listing of the Exhibits and witnesses that you intend to present to the Judge at the time of the trial.  Labor Code § 5502 (e) has been held to set out the rule that if witnesses or documents are not listed on that statement, they can be excluded from the trial of the matter.  Many a party has fallen through that pitfall to the dark hole of defeat.

 

On April 30, 2009, the Second District Court of Appeal issued a published opinion in the matter of Bontempo v WCAB, 77 CCC 419  regarding the pre-trial conference statement and the issue of the 15% up/down to the permanent disability.

 

Simply stated, the reforms to the permanent disability schedule included provisions that injured workers who were offered regular, modified or alternative work within 60 days of being declared permanent & stationary would have their PD reduced by 15%.  Failure to offer work resulted in an increase of 15%.  There are some other technical hoops that must be followed & other requirements, but in a nutshell, that is the 15% up/down concept. (Labor Code §4658 (d))

 

Mr. Bontempo, the injured worker, was not offered either alternative, modified or regular work within the 60 days. In fact, they stipulated that the injured worker was receiving the 15% increase for the permanent disability amount.   In the five-pager pre-printed form, the parties checked on the issues page that permanent disability and apportionment were among the issues to be decided by the Judge.

 

After the trial, the Judge issued his decision and set the base PD level payable at $220.   He did not consider the up / down provisions and in his opinion indicated that his reason was that wasn't’t raised as an issue on the Pre-trial Conference Statement.  The injured worker felt his money slipping away because of his attorney’s failure to raise an issue at trial.  Do we hear the doors of the Superior Court opening for a malpractice suit?

 

The Second District rescued the applicant’s attorney by ruling that since this was a pre-printed form and that by checking the boxes indicating that permanent disability and apportionment were among the issues to be decided by the Judge, without further specificity, the 15%  up/down was automatically an issue.

 

The Court said, “… the pretrial conference form promulgated by the Department of Industrial Relations provides no space for designating section 4658, subdivision (d)(2) or (d)(3), as issues, although whether to supplement or decrease a permanent disability award by 15 percent under these provisions is bound to arise regularly and the average practitioner has no reason to believe that the adjustments mandated by these provisions will not be taken under consideration when the facts warrant it.  We conclude, therefore, that when the parties check the boxes labeled “permanent disability” and “apportionment” in the pretrial conference statement, the WCJ is to calculate permanent disability payment under the applicable formula and the evidence presented, which necessarily includes consideration of subdivision (d)(2) and (d)(3) for those claims where subdivision (d) provides the applicable formula.”

 

The pitfall was closed.  The applicant had two claims: one before the reforms and one afterwards.  While the Court allowed the up/down to be applied to the latter, they did not allow it to be used for the pre-reform disability.

 

One can only speculate as to whether the Court would have reached the same result if instead of the 15% up, the issue was that the defendants were not afforded the benefit of a 15% down.

 

These five pagers can be tricky.  They are often done at the Board at the last minute because of inadequate time for preparation.  Despite these impediments, if the case has the issues for the Judge to decide, the pre-trial conference statement becomes the most important document to set out the scope of the trial.  Woe be tide anyone who doesn’t recognize its worth.

 

Thanks for your attention.   Enjoy the summer!

 

      

 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at my new email address slkesq@me.com.

 

 

 Don't miss Steve's Legal Update on June 26th at the SBICA Luncheon.

See the upcoming events calendar for more information......

Have a question for Steve?

Don't hesitate to ask.  Email it to: steve@adjustingworld.com and get it answered right here.

 

top of page

   
   


As the recession grinds on you have a choice to make. If you look carefully among all the whiners and worriers you will see the opportunists. They are the people who are quietly building their portfolio of skills and abilities…poised for the next big uptick. When it happens they will be ready. Will you?

More >>

top of page

   
   



Hangin' With the NCFIA: Medical Fraud

David Dindak

Coast to Coast Data Search

david@2mypi.com

I wanted to end this two part series with a discussion on the rise of Medical Fraud.  The NCFIA had several presenters covering this issue.  Here is a some of the best information from the conference.

Currently, Medical and Medical Provider Fraud seems to be the primary focus for Fraudsters and it is exceeding a billion dollars in Workers’ Comp costs.  This is huge, due to the skyrocketing costs in Workers’ Comp.  

 

Narcotics is a big issue with off-label drugs, which is a large contributor to the problem.  As an example, one of the largest cash products for North Korea is the manufacturing of counterfeit drugs.  Another area of criminal activity is the split off of drugs with Claimants and doctors whereby excess meds are prescribed and billed to the carrier, and the Claimants gives the meds back to the doctor, so they can be re-sold. 

 

One presenter, at the conference, identified 3 new bills that are expected to help with combating the problem.  SB 313 is associated with uninsured employers, that will increase penalties for the uninsured to $1,000.00 per employee.  SB 156 has several components, but the most important is the call for communication with payers of services.  SB 615 is a First Aid bill relating to the use of first aid guidelines.  Many employers are using the OSHA guidelines instead of the Workers’ Comp standards. 

 

Over the last few years, 50%-70% of prosecutions for Workers’ Comp Fraud have been related to Claimant Fraud.  However, the current trend of Claimant Fraud is between 20% and 25%, and the rest is Medical Provider Fraud.

 

Other types of Medical Fraud include billing – inaccurate charges, fees, dates of service, overlapping dates, and the selling of Receivables. 

 

General Treatment Fraud encompasses unlicensed and under-qualified practitioners.  Fraudsters submit billings under multiple Tax ID’s to double and even triple bills. These practices keep money flowing to them and allows the Fraudsters to remain under the auditing radar.  Two other types of fraud that have also seen a rise is Chiropractic and Pharmacy Fraud.

 

Red Flags are Flying

Apparently there have been some Fraud cases where employees of medical offices were selling patient names with their insurance information.  Fraudster clinics use these lists to create bills using real doctors’ names as the referring physicians.  They then send out a huge amount of bills to the carriers.  They won't get paid for every bill, but the money that is received will still produce a healthy return. 

 

Once the checks come in, a “runner” is used to tender the checks for cash at a check-cashing entity.  They will pay a fee for the service, but there is no paper trail.  Sometimes the Fraudsters open a commercial bank account providing fake business ID and ultimately have no fee charged for moving the money around.  If caught, these people are charged with not only Fraud, but Grand Theft and ID Theft. 

 

Raids on addresses of these fake clinics often find an empty room containing only a chair and fax machine.  The “runner” is usually someone that has no association with the fraudulent company, but was paid “X’ dollars just to cash the checks. Frequently they don't even know who they are working for.  In this respect, the “runner” is only provided an address to pick up the checks at a predetermined time, cash them at a particular check-cashing service, and then make a “drop” at a specific location.

 

In another case, someone sold patient lists to crooks that started billing for diagnostic testing.  In order to keep under the radar they were billing at $30-$40 per test.  However, they billed thousands and thousands of dollars for tests that were never done.

 

In the surgical arena, there has been a rash of centers double billing for hardware and appliances.  As an example, an $80,000.00 surgery might include hardware.  However, the center then requests additional authorization just for the hardware and appliances.

 

Vigilance

Here are some suggestions to find out if your medical provider might me a Fraudster.

Utilize a medical bill expert to analyze invoices.  First review your largest cost drivers and newest providers.  Additionally, watch for which providers have the most increase in billing, which are the largest providers, and what correlation is there between the Claimant’s, Doctors, and Attorneys.

Fraud Busters find rather than fighting Liens, adjusters not wanting to go the extra step, offer a smaller percentage to get rid of the lien, and naturally the Fraudster accepts.  So think of that the next time you decide to get rid of that lien you think might be fraudulent .

 

As the rules of Workers’ Comp changes, incentives for fraud change as well.  As an example, SB 899 provides for an increase of PD related to Activity of Daily Living.  This has resulted in Sleep Centers popping up over night.  With PD increasing, there is more incentive for attorneys to get involved, and who suffers - the Carriers, Claimants, Employers, the honest medical providers who cannot compete, and the general public. 

 

Therefore, when the hair on the back of your neck stands up when reviewing some bills from a particular entity you question, have the clinic address checked out to confirm it actually exists.  Verify charges with the patient because they are generally not aware of what is going on.  Also, verify the physical therapist and confirm the referring physician ordered the treatment.

 

Hope this helps by providing the latest in Fraud trends being seen out there.  Have a great month and keep your eyes open and mind sharp.

 

If you have any questions about Sub Rosa, AOE/COE, Fraud or Investigation, email me. at david@2mypi.com   

David Dindak is the CEO of Coast to Coast Data Search, an investigation firm that has successfully serviced the insurance industry for the past 20 years.  He is a licensed PI and a continuing education Instructor in Investigation and Fraud.

David teaches an Investigation & Fraud Training Series to companies. This training series is free and is provided to companies onsite. Adjusters earn continuing education credit for each class in the series.

 

For additional information on Coast to Coast Data Search and/or how to bring the 2009 Investigation and Fraud Training Classes to your company. Contact him at david@2mypi.com or call (800) 282-6278.



top of page

   
   

 

Workers compensation task force urged

Inland Rep. Joe Baca is proposing the creation of a federal task force to study state workers' compensation laws, prompting pushback from business groups who say Congress shouldn't meddle in the issue.

More >>

****************************************

Yamada legislation ends ambiguity over workplace claims

AB 1093, a bill that would clarify that a workers' comp claim can not be denied to an employee-victim based solely on a personal characteristic of the victim and a third party's hatred of that characteristic - such as race, religion, or gender -

More >>

****************************************

Couple accused in California's Largest workers' comp fraud case

A husband and wife from Laguna Hills, Calif., stand accused of what officials say is the largest known workers’ compensation insurance fraud case in the state’s history.

More >>

****************************************

Car Wash Worker Law’ One Step Closer to Permanency

California’s Car Wash Worker Law took a step closer to permanency May 28 when a bill that would eliminate its expiration date passed the state assembly’s Committee on Appropriations in a 12-5 vote. The bill (AB 236) will now move to a full assembly vote where it is expected to pass.

More >>

****************************************

California Provides Assistance to Injured Workers

The California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and the Division of Workers' Compensation (DWC) have teamed up with the Watsonville, Calif.-based Workers' Compensation Enforcement Collaborative (WCEC) provide assistance to injured workers seeking benefits when their employers are illegally uninsured. The DWC's Information and Assistance

More >>

   

top of page

   
   

Have an Insurance Related Event Coming Up?

Email us the relevant information and we can place it in our Events Calendar. Send us a note with

the relevant facts and sponsoring organization to eventform@adjustingworld.com

top of page

     
 

POLL


     
 


DAILY CARTOON click to enlarge
ANDERTOONS.COM OFFICE CARTOONS
     
 


Results of the May Poll
Will Workers' Compensation See Claims for Swine Flu?

Yes                          53%

 No                          46%

top of page

     

top of page

Missed an issue of Adjusting World? Visit our newsletter
archives.

©2003-2009 Adjusting World ..... Disclaimer/Limitation of Liability