inside

 

Adjusting World welcomes emails/letters to the editor and comments on any of our articles. Emails/letters should not exceed 250 words in length and can be sent to the individual email address listed on the article or to: comments@adjustingworld.com.

All emails/letters received become the property of Adjusting World and cannot be returned. Adjusting World reserves the right to print, edit for space, grammar, and clarity. Letters must include the name, address, telephone number and email address of the author. Adjusting World reserves the right to limit the number of emails/letters printed.

Coast to Coast Data Search AD

 
   

Editor's 2 Cents

Things Go Better With COLA

William Nathans
Editor

bill@adjustingworld.com  

To all of you I want to wish you a healthy and happy new year. We are about to embark on another year of changes in the world of worker's compensation.

We are looking at engaging in the COLA wars. The appellate court, in its infinite (workers comp wisdom), has decided that the COLA increases apply to any injury after 1/1/94. So if you can manage to be entitled to a life pension, you are entitled to the increase regardless of your date of injury, meaning if you are injured in 2010, your life pension rate is COLA adjusted starting in 1994. Won't reserving be fun!

We also have the continuing saga of Almarez/Guzman and Oglivie. What the Legislature giveth, the court taketh away. Either the courts or the Legislature will have to come to their senses and clean this up. Imagine politicians coming to their senses (and in an election year).

We will also be dealing with a new permanent disability payment schedule. Surprise it is overdue (just like a state budget). These people cannot do anything timely when it comes to money issues except figure out how to spend other people's.

It will be interesting to see what effect the healthcare reform will have on the system that we know and love. Will comp be excluded? If it is, the medical profession will have a field day, more than many of them are having already.

As usual, it will be fun!

 

Comments, questions, e-mail me at bill@adjustingworld.com

top of page

   
 

2010 New Laws

 

Stephen L. Kline, Esq.
steve@adjustingworld.com

 

On January 1, 2010, as you were getting ready for the Rose Bowl Parade and installing that app for this year’s resolutions, six new worker’s compensation laws came into effect.  Of course, none are as dramatic as the changes that came into effect on January 1, 2004 or April 19, 2004, but I am not sure we need more of that kind of drama.

Assembly Bill 361 added section Labor Code §4610.3. The major part of the new section provides that, “an employer that authorizes medical treatment shall not rescind or modify that authorization after the medical treatment has been provided based on that authorization for any reason, including, but not limited to, the employer’s subsequent determination that the physician who treated the employee was not eligible to treat that injured employee. If the authorized medical treatment consists of a series of treatments or services, the employer may rescind or modify the authorization only for the treatments or services that have not already been provided.”

 

This law could be one of the more significant changes in worker’s compensation this year.  In operation, this new section will not allow for a later rejection of payment for medical services that are authorized and delivered because the services were not provided by a qualified provider or are found not to be arising out of the employment.  This is one law to watch.

 

Assembly Bill 483 adds Insurance Code §11752.75 which provides that the WCIRB shall establish and maintain an Internet Web site, as specified, for the purposes of assisting any person to determine whether an employer is insured for workers’ compensation.  There is to be no charge for the site, but the Insurance Commissioner will set out regulations as to how it will not be used for other purposes.  This will be interesting.  Let’s see if they can get it done within one year of the adoption of the regulations.

Assembly Bill 1093 added Labor Code §3600 (c)  which provides that for purposes of determining whether to grant or deny a workers’ compensation claim, if an employee is injured or killed by a 3rd party in the course of the employee’s employment, no personal relationship or personal connection shall be deemed to exist between the employee and the 3rd party based only on a determination that the 3rd party injured or killed the employee solely because of the 3rd party’s personal beliefs relating to his or her perception of the employee’s race, religious creed, color, national origin, age, gender, disability, sex, or sexual orientation.  This was passed in reaction to an initial claim denial because the death of the worker was a hate crime.

 

Assembly Bill 1227 amends Labor Code §4850 with respect to Los Angeles Public Employees. This bill would, for purposes of these provisions, require that these employees be employed on a regular, full-time basis, but would eliminate the requirement that these employees be members of the Public Employees’ Retirement System or the Los Angeles City Employees’ Retirement System or subject to the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937.The bill would provide that the provisions pertaining to a leave of absence shall not apply to certain public safety personnel who are employees of the City and County of San Francisco.

 

Senate Bill 186 amends Labor Code §4600 to delete the repeal date for those provisions pertaining to an employee’s pre-designation of a personal physician. Pre-designation was scheduled to end on December 31, 2009.  It is now without any sunset date.

Finally, Senate Bill 313 amends Labor Code §3722 to increase the penalty for being an uninsured employer to $1,500 per employee employed during the period the employer was uninsured.  Okay there are the new laws for us to deal with in the first year of the second decade of the 21st Century.  So, how are this year’s new year’s resolutions working out for you?  Keep trying.  Perfection is not an option. Thanks for your attention.

 --- Stephen L. Kline, Esq.

 

Don't miss Steve's Legal Update on January 22, 2010 at the SBICA Luncheon and follow his blog entries on planetworkcomp

See the upcoming events calendar for more information......

Have a question for Steve?

Don't hesitate to ask.  Email it to: steve@adjustingworld.com and get it answered right here.

top of page

   
   

Mastery Doesn't Mean Being Perfect

I run across a lot of high performing leaders in my work. And some of them have a trait in common—the intense drive to be perfect. It’s what propels them to master their specialty, but it can also be their Achilles heel.   Consider the young professional I was talking with recently. He told me he was under intense pressure to “make it” in his field.

More >>

top of page

   
   



Information From First Responders

David Dindak

Coast to Coast Data Search

david@2mypi.com


 

Thought I’d start out this new year by addressing an issue that came up in 2009, wherein claims that occurred off premises were denied based on a First Responder report. 

An important point to remember is that when Law Enforcement and Fire Department personnel report on a call, they’re not investigating with a Workers’ Comp mindset.  They’re interested in providing first aid and documenting the event, not issues like the Going and Coming Rule, because it’s not their job.  As a result, official, First Responder reports might not necessarily contain the pertinent information needed for deciding compensability. 

In one such case we had, the responder’s report describe a serious injury having taken place outside the insured’s premises; after the Claimant completed his shift. 

Based on this information, the Examiner denied the claim and the case became litigated.  We were then assigned the task of obtaining statements and documenting the scene.  The Witness statements were consistent with the Claimant who reported the alleged accident occurred within the insured's premises. 

In another matter, the Claimant was off shift and fell on the sidewalk outside the insured’s leased building.  The First Responder's report stated the fall had taken place in the public parking lot, and the claim was denied.  We were again hired after the denial and found through Witness statements that the alleged injury occurred just outside the employer's door.  This denial was based on the fact that the Claimant was off work and that she fell on a walkway that was not owned by the employer. 

When everything shook loose at trial, and the Judge discovered the incident happened directly in front of the insured’s exit door; that defense went out the window. Although the employer did not own or control that bit of real estate, the employer had a vested interest because customers and employees use that area to enter and exit the premises.

Claims similar to these occur frequently, and relying on First Responder reports entirely can be costly.  Early intervention by your Risk Manager or obviously your favorite PI can help mitigate defense costs down the road.

That’s all for this month.  Writing this one early in the morning and have to get on the treadmill and try burning off some of the LB’s that came out of nowhere over the past couple weeks.

Happy New Year, and have a prosperous 2010. 

Take care one and all.

 

If you have any questions about Sub Rosa, AOE/COE, Fraud or Investigation, email me. at david@2mypi.com   

David Dindak is the CEO of Coast to Coast Data Search, an investigation firm that has successfully serviced the insurance industry for the past 20 years.  He is a licensed PI and a continuing education Instructor in Investigation and Fraud.

David teaches an Investigation & Fraud Training Series to companies. This training series is free and is provided to companies onsite. Adjusters earn continuing education credit for each class in the series.

 

For additional information on Coast to Coast Data Search and/or how to bring the 2009 Investigation and
Fraud Training Classes to your company. Contact him at david@2mypi.com or call (800) 282-6278.



top of page

   
   

 

Plan to sell piece of State Compensation Insurance Fund collapses

The proposal, part of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's effort to help fill California's $20-billion budget hole, is tied up in court after Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner sues.

More >>
*************************************************************************************************************************
New formula to simplify workers comp calculation

California will use a single ’split point’ of $7,000 for each workers comp claim into primary and excess components rather than the current formula for splitting claims,” Dressler says. “Since primary losses effect an employer’s experience modification more than excess losses, this change makes
More >>
*************************************************************************************************************************
New year brings new laws in Solano County and beyond

With every new year comes the opportunity for a fresh start, as well as dozens of new ways to get busted should you happen to be unaware of legislation that takes effect on New Year's Day.

More >>

*************************************************************************************************************************
Six Factors Create Volatility in Calif. Workers' Comp Insurance Market

."Since insurance rates were partially deregulated in 1995, the California workers’ compensation insurance market has been very volatile. For reasons that go beyond price deregulation, there have been dramatic swings in insurers’ underwriting profits and the share of coverage written by private

More >>

   

top of page

   
   

   
   

Have an Insurance Related Event Coming Up?

Email us the relevant information and we can place it in our Events Calendar.
Send us a note with
the relevant facts and sponsoring organization to eventform@adjustingworld.com

top of page

     
 

POLL


     
 


DAILY CARTOON click to enlarge
ANDERTOONS.COM OFFICE CARTOONS
     
 

Results of the December Poll
Should Workers' Compensation be denied to Illegals?

Yes                     64 %

 No                      35 %


top of page

     

top of page

Missed an issue of Adjusting World? Visit our newsletter
archives.

©2003-2010 Adjusting World ..... Disclaimer/Limitation of Liability